Taking ethical photos of children for medical and research purposes in low-resource settings: an exploratory qualitative study
© Devakumar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 11 January 2013
Accepted: 26 June 2013
Published: 9 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
|11 Jan 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philippe Calain|
|12 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Berle|
|24 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Mavroforou|
|27 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Delan Devakumar|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philippe Calain|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|9 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-14-27|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.