Ethical aspects of directly observed treatment for tuberculosis: a cross-cultural comparison
© Sagbakken et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 27 March 2013
Accepted: 26 June 2013
Published: 2 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
|27 Mar 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Lessells|
|24 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Geetika Verma|
|10 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Mette Sagbakken|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|2 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-14-25|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.