Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Bioethics in popular science: evaluating the media impact of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks on the biobank debate

BMC Medical Ethics201314:10

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-10

Received: 16 August 2012

Accepted: 19 February 2013

Published: 28 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kieran O'Doherty
23 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - david kaufman
14 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Matthew Nisbet
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Matthew Nisbet
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Matthew Nisbet
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kieran O'Doherty
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
19 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
28 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-14-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Communication, American University

Advertisement