Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Recruiting Terminally Ill Patients into Non-Therapeutic Oncology Studies: views of Health Professionals

  • Erika Kleiderman1Email author,
  • Denise Avard1,
  • Lee Black1,
  • Zuanel Diaz2,
  • Caroline Rousseau2 and
  • Bartha Maria Knoppers1
BMC Medical Ethics201213:33

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-33

Received: 17 July 2012

Accepted: 29 November 2012

Published: 5 December 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
17 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eduardo Rodriguez
4 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carolyn Ells
13 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Erika Kleiderman
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
5 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-13-33

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Centre of Genomics and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Dept of Human Genetics, McGill University
Québec-Clinical Research Organization in Cancer (Q-CROC), Jewish General Hospital