Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Pharmaceutical information systems and possible implementations of informed consent - developing an heuristic

BMC Medical Ethics201213:30

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-30

Received: 26 April 2012

Accepted: 17 October 2012

Published: 16 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
26 Apr 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lars Ursin
20 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - clare delany
24 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adrian Carter
4 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Ploug
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lars Ursin
11 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adrian Carter
24 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - clare delany
17 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Ploug
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Ploug
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
17 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
16 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-13-30

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Applied Ethics and Philosophy of Science, Department of Communication, Aalborg University Copenhagen
(2)
University of Manchester, Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, School of Law
(3)
Center for Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo

Advertisement