Patterns of biomedical science production in a sub-Saharan research center
© Agnandji et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 25 September 2011
Accepted: 26 March 2012
Published: 26 March 2012
Open Peer Review reports
|25 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - SELIDJI Todagbe AGNANDJI|
|29 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philippe Calain|
|22 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Ramharter|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philippe Calain|
|6 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Ramharter|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Mar 2012||Editorially accepted|
|26 Mar 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-13-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.