Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Patterns of biomedical science production in a sub-Saharan research center

  • Selidji T Agnandji1, 2Email author,
  • Valerie Tsassa1,
  • Cornelia Conzelmann1, 2,
  • Carsten Köhler1, 2 and
  • Hans-Jörg Ehni3
BMC Medical Ethics201213:3

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-3

Received: 25 September 2011

Accepted: 26 March 2012

Published: 26 March 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
25 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - SELIDJI Todagbe AGNANDJI
29 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philippe Calain
22 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Ramharter
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philippe Calain
6 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Ramharter
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
26 Mar 2012 Editorially accepted
26 Mar 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-13-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Medical Research Unit, Albert Schweitzer Hospital
(2)
Institut für Tropenmedizin, Universität Tübingen
(3)
Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Universität Tübingen

Advertisement