Improving understanding of clinical trial procedures among low literacy populations: an intervention within a microbicide trial in Malawi
© Ndebele et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 19 July 2012
Accepted: 5 November 2012
Published: 8 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
|19 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Ndebele|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna-Maija Pietilä|
|17 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Appiah-Poku|
|26 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Ndebele|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|5 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|8 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-13-29|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.