Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Procedure versus process: ethical paradigms and the conduct of qualitative research

BMC Medical Ethics201213:25

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-25

Received: 17 May 2012

Accepted: 18 September 2012

Published: 27 September 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
17 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edwin van Teijlingen
3 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael McDonald
10 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Kristian Pollock
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael McDonald
8 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edwin van Teijlingen
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
18 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
27 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-13-25

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Physiotherapy, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre

Advertisement