A qualitative study using traditional community assemblies to investigate community perspectives on informed consent and research participation in western Kenya
© Vreeman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 19 June 2012
Accepted: 3 September 2012
Published: 25 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
|19 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maureen Kelley|
|11 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - J L Hutton|
|28 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Rachel Vreeman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|25 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-13-23|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.