The ethical decisions UK doctors make regarding advanced cancer patients at the end of life - the perceived (in) appropriateness of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: A qualitative study
© Sheard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 20 February 2012
Accepted: 27 August 2012
Published: 4 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
|20 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eduardo Rodriguez|
|3 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sergio Litewka|
|23 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Suzanne Kosmider|
|6 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Laura Sheard|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Suzanne Kosmider|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|4 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-13-22|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.