Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The four principles: Can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making?

BMC Medical Ethics201213:10

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-10

Received: 22 January 2012

Accepted: 20 May 2012

Published: 20 May 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
22 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antonio G. Spagnolo
7 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Edgar
9 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matjaz Zwitter
12 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Katie Page
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 May 2012 Editorially accepted
20 May 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-13-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Public Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology