Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries
© de Vries et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 4 October 2010
Accepted: 18 March 2011
Published: 18 March 2011
Open Peer Review reports
|4 Oct 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eduardo Rodriguez|
|2 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Mullings|
|5 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karin Esposito|
|13 Dec 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Jantina de Vries|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Dec 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Mar 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Jantina de Vries|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Mar 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Mar 2011||Editorially accepted|
|18 Mar 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-12-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.