Risk communication and informed consent in the medical tourism industry: A thematic content analysis of canadian broker websites
© Penney et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 22 March 2011
Accepted: 26 September 2011
Published: 26 September 2011
Open Peer Review reports
|22 Mar 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eduardo Rodriguez|
|9 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sergio Litewka|
|3 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Jeremy Snyder|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Jeremy Snyder|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Sep 2011||Editorially accepted|
|26 Sep 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-12-17|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.