Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Secondary uses and the governance of de-identified data: Lessons from the human genome diversity panel

BMC Medical Ethics201112:16

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-16

Received: 16 March 2011

Accepted: 26 September 2011

Published: 26 September 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
16 Mar 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan McGregor
7 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Norbert W. Paul
20 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Malia Fullerton
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Malia Fullerton
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Malia Fullerton
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
26 Sep 2011 Editorially accepted
26 Sep 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-12-16

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine
(2)
Center for Biomedical Ethics and Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine

Advertisement