Personal genome testing: Test characteristics to clarify the discourse on ethical, legal and societal issues
© Bunnik et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 25 February 2011
Accepted: 14 June 2011
Published: 14 June 2011
Open Peer Review reports
|25 Feb 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Heather Skirton|
|5 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kris Dierickx|
|10 May 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Eline Maria Bunnik|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 May 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kris Dierickx|
|26 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Heather Skirton|
|13 Jun 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Eline Maria Bunnik|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Jun 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Jun 2011||Editorially accepted|
|14 Jun 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-12-11|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.