Which medical error to disclose to patients and by whom? Public preference and perceptions of norm and current practice
© Hammami et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 23 July 2010
Accepted: 18 October 2010
Published: 18 October 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Jul 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eduardo Rodriguez|
|19 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sergio Litewka|
|24 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - KW Goodman|
|25 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - José Geraldo de Freitas Drumond|
|18 Sep 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Muhammad Hammami|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Sep 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - KW Goodman|
|16 Oct 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Muhammad Hammami|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|16 Oct 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Oct 2010||Editorially accepted|
|18 Oct 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-11-17|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.