How informed is consent in vulnerable populations? Experience using a continuous consent process during the MDP301 vaginal microbicide trial in Mwanza, Tanzania
© Vallely et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 29 August 2009
Accepted: 13 June 2010
Published: 13 June 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|29 Aug 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Graham Lindegger|
|30 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kathleen MacQueen|
|1 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Keymanthri Moodley|
|24 Dec 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Vallely|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Dec 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Jan 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Graham Lindegger|
|29 Jan 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Keymanthri Moodley|
|6 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Annette Dula|
|10 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Vallely|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Annette Dula|
|3 Jun 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Vallely|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Jun 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Jun 2010||Editorially accepted|
|13 Jun 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-11-10|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.