Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Technology assessment and resource allocation for predictive genetic testing: A study of the perspectives of Canadian genetic health care providers

  • Alethea Adair1,
  • Robyn Hyde-Lay1Email author,
  • Edna Einsiedel2 and
  • Timothy Caulfield1
Contributed equally
BMC Medical Ethics200910:6

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-10-6

Received: 15 April 2008

Accepted: 18 June 2009

Published: 18 June 2009

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
15 Apr 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 May 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Saskia Sanderson
9 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nina Hallowell
22 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jürgen Barth
5 Nov 2008 Author responded Author comments - Robyn Hyde-Lay
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Nov 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nina Hallowell
1 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jürgen Barth
9 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Saskia Sanderson
6 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Robyn Hyde-Lay
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jürgen Barth
12 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Robyn Hyde-Lay
Resubmission - Version 5
12 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Robyn Hyde-Lay
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
18 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
18 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-10-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Health Law Institute, University of Alberta
(2)
Faculty of Communications and Culture, University of Calgary

Advertisement