Assessment of the capacity to consent to treatment in patients admitted to acute medical wards
© Fassassi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 10 December 2008
Accepted: 2 September 2009
Published: 2 September 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Dec 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aneel Bhangu|
|5 Jan 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Wilson|
|5 Jan 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stuart White|
|5 Feb 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Sylfa FASSASSI|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Feb 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Mar 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Sylfa FASSASSI|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Mar 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Apr 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stuart White|
|5 May 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Wilson|
|25 Jun 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Sylfa FASSASSI|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|25 Jun 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|2 Sep 2009||Editorially accepted|
|2 Sep 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-10-15|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.